Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:25:31 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen <marco@beishuizen.info> To: Andreas Davour <ante@Update.UU.SE> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acroread7 Message-ID: <20050323202358.C715@yokozuna.lan> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503232006440.15221@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503231249590.11985@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE> <20050323190313.D715@yokozuna.lan> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503232006440.15221@Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On stardate Wed, 23 Mar 2005, the wise Andreas Davour entered: > Exactly the same. > > As Erik (et al) wrote, it will all be pulled in and resolved as dependencies > if you have a sufficienyly up-to-date ports tree. > > Kind of annyoing that it wasn't caught before it was comitted at all, but > considering the total confusion that reigns right now with two different > acroread ports it's just what can be expected. > > I did a cvsup 30 minutes ago, and then it worked. > > /Andreas Hmm I also did a cvsup, but it makes no difference, I still get the sam error. I guess I have an other problem on my system. Marco -- "I'd love to go out with you, but there are important world issues that need worrying about."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050323202358.C715>