Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 12:32:08 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Who needs these silly statfs changes... Message-ID: <20031116123040.M3037@gamplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <3FB6AB7E.42F9C0BE@mindspring.com> References: <20031113020400.GA44619@xor.obsecurity.org> <3FB4E8A1.6090402@openet-telecom.com> <3FB6AB7E.42F9C0BE@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > I just got around to testing the patch in that reply: > [ ... ] > > This seems to work. On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc > > disk (**): > > Try it again. This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve > as the root user, and see what the client machine reports. Compare > the results to an identical local FS. Er, that is the main thing that the test did. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031116123040.M3037>