Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 15:38:54 -0500 From: "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> To: "'Timur I. Bakeyev'" <timur@com.bat.ru>, <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD Port: samba* Message-ID: <20040223203856.4782543D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <web-156290@mail.bat.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I see. I ran the 3.0.x branch and I've found it to be stable for the most part, however character conversion (needed to setup file sharing for Macs) did not work, and neither did the vfs modules I needed. Hope the issues get resolved soon. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Timur I. Bakeyev [mailto:timur@com.bat.ru] Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 6:42 AM To: Mike Jakubik; dwcjr@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba* On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500 "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> wrote: >Hello, > > I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to samba-old and >samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the latest stable >code is 3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security updates. Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, at least. If you take a look on a samba roadmap, they expect stability only in the 3.x series of samba. Samba 3 is still for brave ones or for those who need new features badly :) Cheers, Timur.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040223203856.4782543D1F>