Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:24:39 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? Message-ID: <d763ac660908291924q5c61fcd9q2ff638ba9a009f0a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <m2vdk62gys.wl%randy@psg.com> References: <77abe410908211256g44dd20d8o9b50c20357e63a6b@mail.gmail.com> <d763ac660908281618u50d9ebf7i45f41fdb7f42924e@mail.gmail.com> <4A98DFF6.4060404@prgmr.com> <d763ac660908290241o4440a5f5ucba1866c5ed5ebff@mail.gmail.com> <m363c697xz.fsf@luke.xen.prgmr.com> <m2vdk62gys.wl%randy@psg.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'd -love- to dedicate some clock cycles to writing up a full-featured LVM geom module. Sigh. :) adrian 2009/8/30 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>: >> I started with FreeBSD Jails, and moved to NetBSD/xen2, and only left >> because of the ram limit. =A0 Now that NetBSD 5 is out, I think it's tim= e >> for me to switch back. > > what stops me from that path is that disk pool flexibility is a bit > limited on netbsd. =A0zfs or lvm let me slop disk space to domUs as they > need it. > > randy >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d763ac660908291924q5c61fcd9q2ff638ba9a009f0a>