Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:19:23 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        enlightenment@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   E on FreeBSD: [Bug 224105] [UPDATE] port x11-wm/enlightenment to v0.22.1
Message-ID:  <bug-224105-33756-Pyr1Wtw19W@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-224105-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-224105-33756@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224105

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Kortkamp <tobik@freebsd.org> ---
(In reply to Nils Beyer from comment #2)

> Regarding "PORTEPOCH" - I don't understand your objection. Why should
> PORTEPOCH ever be lower than "0" (zero)? Isn't it sensible to reset PORTE=
POCH=20
> to zero whenever PORTVERSION increases?

No, you can reset PORTREVISION but never decrease or reset PORTEPOCH.
It's increase-only.  See
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#=
makefile-portepoch

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224105-33756-Pyr1Wtw19W>