Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 17:01:38 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/papers/memfs Makefile Message-ID: <199609120901.RAA03067@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Sep 1996 01:45:58 MST." <2342.842517958@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > BTW, I think groff needs to be added to the end of the build-tools target > > for 'make world', apparently the new sgml stuff depends on the new groff > > and/or macros, and there's a lot of man pages and docs that use it as > > well... > > Erm, if sgml depends on it then wouldn't it be a good idea to put > it closer to the beginning, say right after symorder? Shouldn't do. As I understand it, the sgml stuff spits out troff code and uses groff to format it to produce the ascii and .ps docs, while it does the html directly. It shouldn't matter where groff went, as long as it came before the sgml stuff was actually used to format docs in the src/share tree. The people coming from 2.1R or 2.1.5R would be the ones who could tell us. :-) And incidently, putting groff into the build-tools target fixes that !*&#^!(# /usr/share/dict/eign problem once and for all.. :-) > Jordan Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609120901.RAA03067>