Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 18:06:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237768] 12.0-RELEASE: Calling fortune(6) with no parameters yields "No fortunes found" error. Message-ID: <bug-237768-227-64R9mDnElx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237768-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237768-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237768 Ruby Lazuli Lord <nipkraps@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nipkraps@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Ruby Lazuli Lord <nipkraps@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 212535 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D212535&action= =3Dedit Patch to allow the fortune command to look for all fortunes in the fortune directory by default It's worth noting that copying the text-based fortune file isn't enough for fortune to recognize it; a corresponding .dat file must be made with "strfi= le myfortunes". I've attached a patch based off of FreeBSD-CURRENT that should allow fortun= e to look in all fortune files in the directory by default (should I submit this patch as a new bug report? Contributing to FreeBSD doesn't seem to mention whether or not a new report should be filed for patches if a bug report alr= eady exists). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237768-227-64R9mDnElx>