Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:24:07 +0900 From: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@tackymt.homeip.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: softclock swis not bound to specific cpu Message-ID: <20091018202407.656c3863.taku@tackymt.homeip.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
I noticed that the softclock threads didn't seem to be bound to any cpu.
I'm not sure whether it's the Right Thing (TM) to bind them to the
corresponding cpus though: it might be good to give the scheduler a chance
to rebalance callouts.
I'm about to test the modification like the attached diff.
Comments are welcome.
--
-|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku
| __ < <taku@tackymt.homeip.net>
- A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs. -
[-- Attachment #2 --]
--- sys/kern/kern_timeout.c.orig 2009-09-25 09:42:55.007102687 +0900
+++ sys/kern/kern_timeout.c 2009-10-18 19:47:15.537282684 +0900
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ start_softclock(void *dummy)
{
struct callout_cpu *cc;
#ifdef SMP
+ struct intr_event *ie; /* This can be a member of callout_cpu. */
int cpu;
#endif
@@ -210,13 +211,15 @@ start_softclock(void *dummy)
panic("died while creating standard software ithreads");
cc->cc_cookie = softclock_ih;
#ifdef SMP
+ intr_event_bind(clk_intr_event, timeout_cpu);
for (cpu = 0; cpu <= mp_maxid; cpu++) {
if (cpu == timeout_cpu)
continue;
if (CPU_ABSENT(cpu))
continue;
cc = CC_CPU(cpu);
- if (swi_add(NULL, "clock", softclock, cc, SWI_CLOCK,
+ ie = NULL;
+ if (swi_add(&ie, "clock", softclock, cc, SWI_CLOCK,
INTR_MPSAFE, &cc->cc_cookie))
panic("died while creating standard software ithreads");
cc->cc_callout = NULL; /* Only cpu0 handles timeout(). */
@@ -224,6 +227,7 @@ start_softclock(void *dummy)
sizeof(struct callout_tailq) * callwheelsize, M_CALLOUT,
M_WAITOK);
callout_cpu_init(cc);
+ intr_event_bind(ie, cpu);
}
#endif
}
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091018202407.656c3863.taku>