Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 22:16:44 -0700 From: David Johnson <david@usermode.org> To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question Message-ID: <200405222216.44543.david@usermode.org> In-Reply-To: <4CA59E9E-AC2D-11D8-871A-000A95AD47EE@queasyweasel.com> References: <00d701c43c85$0ca36bd0$6501a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <hf1xlhpk17.fsf@valbanera.sdsc.edu> <4CA59E9E-AC2D-11D8-871A-000A95AD47EE@queasyweasel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 22 May 2004 01:19 pm, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > libh never lived up to its promise, that much is certainly true. The downfall of libh, IMHO, is that it was too ambitious. It was an installer, package manager, and universal GUI toolkit all wrapped up into one. Any one of these would be an ambitious undertaking, but all three together was just too much. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405222216.44543.david>