Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 15:22:32 +0900 (JST) From: NINOMIYA Hideyuki <nin@shikoku.ne.jp> To: bsd-nomads@clave.gr.jp, bsd-usb@clave.gr.jp, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: imp@harmony.village.org Subject: Re: [bsd-nomads:16066] Re: proposal: /etc/pccard_ether renaming Message-ID: <20011129.152232.74741737.nin@smtp.shikoku.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <200111270257.fAR2vhM09412@harmony.village.org> <20011124.033803.71087366.nin@smtp.shikoku.ne.jp> References: <20011124.033803.71087366.nin@smtp.shikoku.ne.jp> <200111270257.fAR2vhM09412@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
# This mail send To: bsd-nomads@clave.gr.jp,
# bsd-usb@clave.gr.jp, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG
# This is a thing only FreeBSD
This is proposal: /etc/pccard_ether renaming
I wrote in Japanese:
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 03:38:04 +0900 (JST)
Subject: [bsd-nomads:16054] proposal: /etc/pccard_ether renaming
Message-Id: <20011124.033803.71087366.nin@smtp.shikoku.ne.jp>
me> I think that we had better rename its /etc/pccard_ether.
me> How do you think ? To all.
me>
me> This proposal is not pccard nic association, and it is a thing about
me> usb lan adapter....
me>
me> I wrote like next in /etc/usbd.conf
me> ---8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<---
me> # $FreeBSD: src/etc/usbd.conf,v 1.5.2.2 2000/10/16 16:32:12 n_hibma Exp $
me> device "USB ethernet"
me> devname "[ack]ue[0-9]+"
me> attach "pccard_ether ${DEVNAME} start"
me> detach "pccard_ether ${DEVNAME} stop"
me> ---8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<------8<---
me> This is very useful.
me>
me> So I thought that file name of this pccard_ether was not good.
me>
me> Because the removable interface was only pccard when this script
me> was written at first, thus it was good. But we can use usb now
me> and may increase furthermore sometime soon (BlueTooth, FireWire
me> ... etc...).
me>
me> Because it is useful for all they removable interface, we will
me> rename this script into better identifier and I think that it
me> is good to use by default this in usbd.conf.
me>
me> some renaming idea:
me> removable_ether
me> rc.removable_if
I got the following comment from Mr. Warner for this email.
Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:57:43 -0700
Subject: [bsd-nomads:16066] Re: prososal: /etc/pccard_ether renaming
Message-Id: <200111270257.fAR2vhM09412@harmony.village.org>
imp> The name pccard_ether is a little bad. Yesterday we had PC Card.
imp> Today we have CardBus, USB, Firewire. Who knows what we'll have
imp> tomorrow?
imp> ..
imp>
imp> I think that dynamic_ether or dynamic_if might be better names.
How do all of you think ?
----
***************************************************************
* This message is a thing by output of automatic translation. *
* Therefore it will be for there to be a lot of funny parts. *
* Please approve it. *
***************************************************************
NINOMIYA(family name) Hideyuki(fast name) @ ehime japan
mailto:nin@shikoku.ne.jp mailto:nin@Jp.FreeBSD.org
PGP-Fingerprint:6C59 EC08 5B23 6490 44D0 7CD3 DA40 219F 7114 8553
PGP-Public-Key: http://user.shikoku.ne.jp/~nin/pgp/public-key.txt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011129.152232.74741737.nin>