Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 257991] devel/p5-Params-Coerce: Update to 0.15
Message-ID:  <bug-257991-7788-Kx4fqy6gy4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-257991-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-257991-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257991

--- Comment #4 from Sergei Vyshenski <svysh.fbsd@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nuno Teixeira from comment #3)
Nuno,

Thank you for your concern.
Let me clarify.=20
Maybe here we have an example of a bigger problem.
I do not have a goal to collect unattended ports.
I am just concerned about updating dependencies for my main port=20
security/p5-openxpki.
It has many hundreds of dependencies=20
(if you count test_dependecies, there are around a thousand of them).
And often it is essential that these dependencies be up to date --
for correct work of the named port.
Some maintainers of these dependencies have been not seen=20
in the FreeBSD project for 10-15 years.
Often when I try to update a such, I takes months.
With time patches turn obsolete, I have to recreate them.
IMHO this practice is strange and even humiliating.
And maybe it is worth reconsidering.

Regards, Sergei

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-257991-7788-Kx4fqy6gy4>