Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:45:37 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> To: jmallett@FreeBSD.org Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make job.c job.h main.c make.1 make.c Message-ID: <20020413.154537.75694059.imp@village.org> In-Reply-To: <20020413164457.GA8591@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <20020413053330.A96771@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020413151913.GB26522@FreeBSD.ORG> <20020413164457.GA8591@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20020413164457.GA8591@FreeBSD.ORG>
"J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 03:19:13PM +0000, J. Mallett wrote:
: >
: > Thoughts? If that seems reasonable I'll post my diffs relative to NetBSD
: > make(1) should I not run into some place where it pukes. If anyone knows
: > of a place where NetBSD's make(1) has been known not to work with what we
: > need it to work with, please let me know so I can try to fix that.
: >
:
: I just got through a buildworld, so I decided it's time to post the diffs.
:
: I'm going to run it with our make(1) now, and compare performance. If there
: is not a significant boost, and if there aren't things in NetBSD that stand
: out as things we want, I'm not sure whether it's worth it or not. I like the
: ability to use ODE :@<variable>@<string>@, but that's neither here nor there.
:
: The diffs explain: http://people.freebsd.org/~jmallett/NetBSD.make.diff
These are just to the make program itself. Are you telling me that we
can now make it through a buildworld with NetBSD's make in the tree?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020413.154537.75694059.imp>