Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 21:26:52 +0200 From: Olivier Certner <olce@freebsd.org> To: Anthony Pankov <anthony.pankov@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs in jails Message-ID: <2350477.mfXeX5GmMH@francois> In-Reply-To: <726228310.20250409185914@yahoo.com> References: <726228310.20250409185914.ref@yahoo.com> <726228310.20250409185914@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, There's no reason (that I know of) you could not use unionfs in jails. However, unionfs has been needing attention and deep fixes for a long time (irrespective of its use in jails), which has been on my TODO list for a while (work should start relatively soon now...). There has been stabilization work by jah@ in the past years. At this point, your best bet is just to try it and report any problem you encounter. Thanks and regards. -- Olivier Certner [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCQAdFiEEmNCxHjkosai0LYIujKEwQJceJicFAmf2yfwACgkQjKEwQJce Jic0LQ/+JAOmPdRaV1qcckzcP8tZdO3O14K2/HUGT2akPf3Ow7q1WiEKAhmCRlVy Ijfj6Oms2Ex6cHHyCdN7ArqaM6YeyUypdwB57WvdvT06tXTW3INn+Lc3RrKemHsT 57TGqj/20w3auO457xIiAYSkxUhPdZ8ua6of4F9bl/MXfL8DSGOyoBDQJ57mO1Cm CUu0c1K7ZzhNSSMFLUjnqulfQY1DlfW1OTAMaysl8LaYDvSYTRMJOF5z1bMDemmg yOqFX27BRmE60bReYEVTlI0nukeaFH7CYf+kUAl8U79FUCuDIUK70FgPD5oXWgUc sJ1JTGoynvZ4KtUkHLKa6T+v0EgwR5lQhvAxRlX8e8uBwh/Wv0WsFvRSyzS0SIAA EVKj8DNBSpzt34YKwEp9t5NdofyrLoIN7BRUJm/S1/NLGpiuvvrmALMOnkjBTl6j +lHrwCArdnJ6G8zEaFfEWaIwqWFs3p1K8RehfxvHuDKTiEcVS48LGp4Do6GSHTJQ KZ0Eaz+ggJhICDDnnkMR5605MbMK0K0eqwJZXh811Js+Dqbjtc4ZAvWQQSFrEk7Z eTzqNBDDUoKILlfE9yN8i+1dKi/sPVL8xg8A+BUGL7JZgn/a/J9IvctdjcHfd9+o 8GO4+ZjCDvi7gPEEgoQgvU+k0KdM9r0oFGklzsg8ZYkH/unpI5U= =vbCP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2350477.mfXeX5GmMH>
