Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:39:08 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mingw32-gcc Makefile Message-ID: <20040226203908.GA80665@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20040225182238.GA76015@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200402251130.i1PBUMuc078425@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040225182238.GA76015@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:22:39AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:22AM -0800, Lev A. Serebryakov wrote: > > lev 2004/02/25 03:30:22 PST > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > devel/mingw32-gcc Makefile > > Log: > > This prot WORKS on sparc64. Tested five minutes ago on panther.freebsd.org. > > No, it is broken on bento as stated, as you can see for yourself by > checking the error logs. This means it is likely to be broken in > certain user environments as well. Please attempt to understand the > nature of the failure instead of pretending it doesn't exist. Uhm, it seems that Lev encountered occasionally poped up issue of when port fails to build on bento, but builds/work flawlessly on "normal setup" box(es). This is (was) the case with multimedia/WMxmms, for instance. While problems like these should definitely be addressed at some point (whether by fixing bento build farm setup or implementing some workaround in the port itself), marking such ports IGNORE instead of BROKEN seems like a reasonable band-aid for now. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226203908.GA80665>