Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:34:53 +0100 From: Matthias Muthmann <mmuthmann@gmx.net> To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Cc: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Subject: Re: Problems with X.. Message-ID: <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503021050.35620.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1109789237.19508.3.camel@localhost> <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mi, 2005-03-02 at 20:10 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > Just the ones that don't work (if they are consecutive in the row, only a > range would be fine). I'm also interested in whether without these patches > applied - was the row in question behaving the same as the other keys (ie > codes generated being off by one) or was it behaving differently even then? > > > Dejan > Ok, now I tried X without your patches. The lowest row behaves in the same way as with your patches: e.g. keycode 198 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol) But the keycodes are shifted by one (Y is 191, not 190 ...) -- Matthias Muthmann <mmuthmann@gmx.net> [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCKIAdeA8bkj+29gMRAsdbAKCRp+J6gsRWeQfdgV0Jl0YaeA9eiwCfbFos YguyZiSkMhyLpv8oNZsOE7U= =JkEP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1109950493.21431.5.camel>