Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 07:52:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: a better idea for package dependencies Message-ID: <20000509075209.D6350@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005081828430.8976-100000@rac5.wam.umd.edu>; from culverk@wam.umd.edu on Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:30:17PM -0400 References: <20000508124300.A52207@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005081828430.8976-100000@rac5.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 06:30:17PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > Actually, it has to do with the pkg_ commands, which I believe are built > when you make world... yes. > and aren't part of the ports, And are only used for Ports. Thus their behavior defines the behavior of the Ports Collection. Thus it is a Ports issue. IF the pkg_* utils were ports, how would you install them?? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000509075209.D6350>