Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 21:05:34 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (aka Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage) <ache@astral.msk.su> To: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, ache@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sbin@freefall.freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/slattach uucplock.c Makefile Message-ID: <WBUXlNmuQ1@ache.dialup.demos.ru> In-Reply-To: <199509191620.SAA06595@uriah.heep.sax.de>; from J Wunsch at Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:20:49 %2B0200 (MET DST) References: <199509191620.SAA06595@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199509191620.SAA06595@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes: >My wrapper does dialing on its own (with chat(1) from the ppp >package). In order to dial and not being disturbed by e.g. mgetty, i >have to obtain the lock before dialing starts. Hence i create the >lockfile (or reduce to go on). If the lock fails, the wrapper will >never start slattach at all. I understand. How you do redialing in your case? >Well, as long as slattach doesn't give up when the lockfile already >exists, i wouldn't mind. It does, that is lockfiles purpose :-( It seems that I need to make lockfiles by an option, not as default case... -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?WBUXlNmuQ1>