Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:47:28 -0600 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: OpenCVS Message-ID: <16823.30320.849399.610561@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@brierdr.com> typed: > One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes > any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another > implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like > SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to > p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide > here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only > be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold > over what's currently available now. The interesting question is how much of a cvs clone is OpenCVS? If it will work with existing repositories, then there isn't any transition required - just plug in the software. But finding that out will require waiting until there is a release of OpenCVS. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16823.30320.849399.610561>