Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:37:12 -0700 From: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: Installing make as pmake when WITH_BMAKE specified (was Re: [CFT/RFC]: refactor bsd.prog.mk to understand multiple programs instead of a singular program) Message-ID: <20121026163712.GF43045@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wT8A9bjBH=wsFB6CC5agobS=SOvPZyGEAC8giAQMu8M2A@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGH67wT8A9bjBH=wsFB6CC5agobS=SOvPZyGEAC8giAQMu8M2A@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:00:21PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Here's an updated version of the workaround that works properly in all > cases and installs bmake as make and links make to pmake when > WITH_BMAKE=yes, and installs make as make when WITHOUT_BMAKE is > specified (this works better than the previous patch I sent to Simon). Also, please note we have a 'pmake' port that is the proper original pmake (before *BSD embellished it). Perhaps a different name than 'pmake' is appropriate. It would not surprise me for someone to end up adding a port of the current FreeBSD make in case there are folks that find bmake incompatible with their use of FreeBSD's make in their own projects. So picking a good name now would be helpful. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121026163712.GF43045>