Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 07:53:49 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Enumerating glibc dependencies Message-ID: <1422971629.3446909.222482893.6AA0AE96@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1422971333.3444346.222480213.4886CF10@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <mailman.87.1422619202.67459.freebsd-security@freebsd.org> <20150202150721.E8553209@hub.freebsd.org> <20150202152243.GA29176@in-addr.com> <20150202164319.GL11558@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1502020849580.24056@eboyr.pbz> <20150202185806.BD0AF865@hub.freebsd.org> <1422971333.3444346.222480213.4886CF10@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 07:48, Mark Felder wrote: > > Unless you're building a Frankenstein OS you should never come across a > situation where a native FreeBSD binary is linked to glibc. (I'm not > even sure it's possible!) Linux uses glibc for their libc reference, we > use our own. I forgot Debian K/FreeBSD existed which has a complete GNU base system. So it has to be possible. But doesn't make it sane! :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1422971629.3446909.222482893.6AA0AE96>