Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 03 Feb 2015 07:53:49 -0600
From:      Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Enumerating glibc dependencies
Message-ID:  <1422971629.3446909.222482893.6AA0AE96@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1422971333.3444346.222480213.4886CF10@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <mailman.87.1422619202.67459.freebsd-security@freebsd.org> <20150202150721.E8553209@hub.freebsd.org> <20150202152243.GA29176@in-addr.com> <20150202164319.GL11558@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1502020849580.24056@eboyr.pbz> <20150202185806.BD0AF865@hub.freebsd.org> <1422971333.3444346.222480213.4886CF10@webmail.messagingengine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 07:48, Mark Felder wrote:
> 
> Unless you're building a Frankenstein OS you should never come across a
> situation where a native FreeBSD binary is linked to glibc. (I'm not
> even sure it's possible!) Linux uses glibc for their libc reference, we
> use our own.

I forgot Debian K/FreeBSD existed which has a complete GNU base system.
So it has to be possible. But doesn't make it sane! :-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1422971629.3446909.222482893.6AA0AE96>