Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 19:22:10 +0800 From: "Derek Barrett" <derekbarrett@graffiti.net> To: <sporner@nentec.de>, "Lasse L. Johnsen" <lasse@freebsdcluster.org> Cc: <verm@drunkmonk.net>, freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: project hosting Message-ID: <20020715112210.18663.qmail@graffiti.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good morning/evening everybody! Andy, Well, the patch to version 213 isn't major, it just fixes the build problem by removing the -ld switch within one of the make files. As far as running the software goes, I've just been concentrating on getting it installed and configured, and working with other contributors on the list, to get the docs updated to reflect the process. Unfortunatley I have to give up one of my machines, so I'm down to 2 test machines. Someone has to have an old clunker around I can use. Lasse, Someone on this list mentioned they had some machines available for testing. I can't remember who it was. I'll look it up though. As far as Sourceforge goes, I like the idea of keeping the work to the server that Amar has dedicated, he is a pro with tools like DocBook and CVS. But maybe later we can put a simple link on Sourceforge, to his server like someone suggested. Most of the major projects I see there usually have an external site as their headquarters anyway. Derek ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Sporner <sporner@nentec.de> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 11:16:29 +0200 To: "Lasse L. Johnsen" <lasse@freebsdcluster.org> Subject: Re: project hosting > OK, > > I am going to make the suggestion that we go ahead as we had originally > planned and make use of the work that Amar had started. It is probably > a good idea to put a home page on SF for those who might be interested in > this go find us. > > Amar, why not check the current (what you did to fix the TK/BLT thing in). > > Derek, what were the specific changes in V-212 that are posted on Chris's > website? We need to get them rolled into Amar's changes. > > Has anybody had any success using the software yet? I don't believe in this > case that 'no news is good news' ;-) > > > Andy > > > Lasse L. Johnsen wrote: > > >Yes, I agree, in the long term the dedicated machine will be a lot more useful > >than Sourceforge will in the short term. > > > >/Lasse > > > >Quoting Amar Takhar <verm@drunkmonk.net>: > > > >>On 2002-07-09 12:54 -0700, Brett D. Estrade wrote: > >> > >>>Has there been any consideration for using http://www.sourceforge.org > >>>to host the project? It has everything a project could need/want from > >>>what I am familiar with. If this was considered before but > >>>discounted, what were the issues? > >>> > >>Sourceforge is *highly* over-rated, it's slow and well over-used. We have > >>our > >>own fast dedicated machine that's 100% for our own use. I don't see why we > >>would close our options by going to something like sourceforge. > >> > >>Amar. > >> > >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > >> > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message > > -- _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://www.graffiti.net Powered by Outblaze To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020715112210.18663.qmail>