Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:17:24 -0500 (EST)
From:      Ben Rosengart <ben@skunk.org>
To:        Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bzip2 in src tree
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001241314370.14446-100000@penelope.skunk.org>
In-Reply-To: <v0422080fb4b207279756@[195.238.1.121]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:

> 	And the only cost is the slight expansion of the amount of disk 
> space required to store the source code in /usr/src and the binaries 
> in /usr/bin [...]

And the time and disk space required to make world.  No thank you.
Remember that the only win here is if bzip is used in an infrastructural
capacity (e.g. for packages and other install stuff), and it has been
pointed out that the savings on disk space are offset by the additional
memory requirements.  If it won't be used for infrastructure, then why
can't it stay in ports?

--
 Ben Rosengart

UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group
StarMedia Network, Inc.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0001241314370.14446-100000>