Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:32:26 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updated mythtv-fixes port Message-ID: <20070325193226.GE46175@chuggalug.clues.com> In-Reply-To: <20070324185725.91d9auipu88gs8w4@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20070323181558.GA46175@chuggalug.clues.com> <20070324145558.2e0f462b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070324151536.GB46175@chuggalug.clues.com> <20070324185725.91d9auipu88gs8w4@webmail.leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:57:25PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Note: The port should not assume any specific processor in the > PACAKGE_BUILDING case (maybe i486 or better). Something like this in the ports make file (while i386 only) .if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING) CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --arch=i486 --disable-mmx .endif The above needs to be handle each architecture, what are the minimum CPUs for packages built for each platform? i386 is i486 ? amd64 is k8? (If so this is good, the binary package will be optimised) UltraSPARC? Power? Alpha? The MythTV, configure at least, knows about iWMMXt for arm/Xscale
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070325193226.GE46175>