Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:23:47 -0500 From: Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best freBDS 64bit version or fork for ~2001-2002 DEC Aplha? Message-ID: <20160316162347.GH4140350@physics.umn.edu> In-Reply-To: <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <CA%2BHm=ZCJEJHE249G96yZJnTmkUxK0Ey5ZWZc8Py5gZLabuXJzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160316120940.da515c86.freebsd@edvax.de> <20160316113721.cc9fbf4ee4f1e9d930178cdc@sohara.org> <20160316130716.c10d580e.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:37:21 +0000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > NetBSD may be a better option. > > Yes, NetBSD support is probably much better - both the OS and > the applications are current. > > http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/ > > NetBSD/alpha 7.0 sure is worth trying. OpenBSD also still supports alpha, as far as I can tell. http://www.openbsd.org/alpha.html Graham
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160316162347.GH4140350>