Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 23:59:45 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <20060101045945.GB1464@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051231213407.GA752@funkthat.com> References: <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org> <32729773-B07C-4AEE-92D0-62ACE0E3AFEB@freebsd.org> <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org> <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org> <43B3768F.40704@freebsd.org> <811F628B-A89B-4359-A219-13B5337726A9@freebsd.org> <43B378BA.10201@freebsd.org> <20051231034731.GA65751@xor.obsecurity.org> <43B67C49.2010904@freebsd.org> <20051231213407.GA752@funkthat.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 01:34:08PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > David Xu wrote this message on Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 20:40 +0800: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > >>I remembered its highest number is 216xxx. > > > > > >I don't believe you :-) > > > > Get a Pentium-D , then test it by yourself. :-) > > I think he mean he doesn't believe that it's 200k+... you have three > numbers and three x's... > Yeah, a factor of >10 improvement is not credible. Perhaps you meant 216xx? Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDt2HAWry0BWjoQKURArvEAKDuND3NnmYlMLYMvG4j3JqkcNUA4ACglWkq OTJN3Ws6I4Q4dO5SZRhzW8E= =r/ao -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060101045945.GB1464>