Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 00:25:35 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So we're stuck with using timidity now? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228002452.24007C-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <199812280517.NAA62889@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > anyway. And with some talking to Dev at 4-front tech, I'm sure an > > > > agreement could be made. > > > > > > OSS is better. Better at panicing my system. Lets use the homegrown > > > solutions before we start implementing a _known_ buggy module. > > > > Are you using the newest OSS? Also, Dev at 4-front tech has told me that > > the problem with his software panicing the kernel is because of problems > > with FreeBSD's virtual memory system. So do we need to fix that, or do we > > need to make Dev find a non-existant workaround (he has already looked for > > one)?? > > I think that problem has been fixed, a month or two ago. contigmalloc() > was doing some silly things. Yeah, I think I was one of the ones that helped with that. However, there are other problems, and Dev says they are not his. Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228002452.24007C-100000>