Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2002 16:19:08 +0930
From:      Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>
To:        David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Do we still need portmap(8)?
Message-ID:  <20021007064908.GH14070@wantadilla.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20021007064255.GA59998@dragon.nuxi.com>
References:  <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20021007064255.GA59998@dragon.nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday,  6 October 2002 at 23:42:55 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 04:02:51PM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems.  Is
>> it still needed, or can it be removed completely?  At the very least,
>> the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS.
>
> Are you saying we've left behind an old manpage?

No, I'm asking whether we have left behind both an old man page and an
old binary.

On closer examination, though, it looks like this is the result of
installing a 4.7 system and immediately upgrading it to 5-CURRENT, so
that the dates of the files looked pretty much the same.  Sorry for
that confusion.  What's the recommended way of getting old binaries
off the system?

Greg
--
See complete headers for address and phone numbers

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021007064908.GH14070>