Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 14:43:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: sergei@gnezdov.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing portupgrade without X.org Message-ID: <20050409214320.GA81681@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <slrnd5gf82.1nb0.use-reply-to@gnezdov.net> References: <8953a1db05040904263a1e2a79@mail.gmail.com> <20050409165612.GA91236@noisy.compsoc.man.ac.uk> <slrnd5gf82.1nb0.use-reply-to@gnezdov.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 01:37:22PM -0700, Sergei Gnezdov wrote: > On 2005-04-09, Lewis Thompson <lewiz@compsoc.man.ac.uk> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:26:48PM +0100, Paul Waring wrote: > >> I'm currently trying to get portupgrade onto my new FreeBSD system by > >> running make install clean from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade (after > >> doing a recent cvsup). Everything seems to go along fine, it starts > >> fetching all the packages it requires and then suddenly I see a > >> download for X.org. > > > > It is not portupgrade that needs X but a dependent port. Which specific > > port? In general just with WITHOUT_X11=1 to /etc/make.conf. > > I think it is > > WITHOUT_X11="YES" > > Does it make any difference? No, the value for such variables is unimportant (WITHOUT_X11="NO" works just as well) Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCWEx4Wry0BWjoQKURAmxwAKDMujn6H/rDmiZYt2hfFZ/hABlLEACgi2L3 OelXFNq6r/BO60eo6WgZoQw= =a29Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050409214320.GA81681>