Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:47:17 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mingw32-gcc Makefile Message-ID: <20040226204716.GG5915@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040226203908.GA80665@regency.nsu.ru> References: <200402251130.i1PBUMuc078425@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040225182238.GA76015@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040226203908.GA80665@regency.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:39:08AM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:22:39AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:30:22AM -0800, Lev A. Serebryakov wrote: > > > lev 2004/02/25 03:30:22 PST > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > devel/mingw32-gcc Makefile=20 > > > Log: > > > This prot WORKS on sparc64. Tested five minutes ago on panther.fr= eebsd.org. > >=20 > > No, it is broken on bento as stated, as you can see for yourself by > > checking the error logs. This means it is likely to be broken in > > certain user environments as well. Please attempt to understand the > > nature of the failure instead of pretending it doesn't exist. >=20 > Uhm, it seems that Lev encountered occasionally poped up issue of when > port fails to build on bento, but builds/work flawlessly on "normal > setup" box(es). This is (was) the case with multimedia/WMxmms, for > instance. While problems like these should definitely be addressed at > some point (whether by fixing bento build farm setup or implementing > some workaround in the port itself), marking such ports IGNORE instead > of BROKEN seems like a reasonable band-aid for now. Lev and I are addressing this off-list, but as I mentioned in my original email the port maintainer should attempt to understand the nature of the failure on bento before writing it off as "it must be a bug with bento". More often than not these problems are due to an unconsidered difference between the maintainer's system and bento, which would be seen in an analogous real-world environment. Kris --MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAPltUWry0BWjoQKURAshGAKCqRzt7dQNWWH+CkNSGqAxvF8gdkACeOUZj RigE1QMZLcMEcXBZGi4bF38= =XkLc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MrRUTeZlqqNo1jQ9--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040226204716.GG5915>