Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:13:51 +0200 From: Gerrit =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChn?= <gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> To: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken re(4) Message-ID: <20080529171351.a3dd5111.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> In-Reply-To: <483E8F38.6070109@andric.com> References: <20080527165232.2acbb00f.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080528002823.GA63696@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080528175610.0ffe4c1c.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <20080529115825.2da70cba.gerrit@pmp.uni-hannover.de> <483E8F38.6070109@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2008 13:10:48 +0200 Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com> wrote about Re: broken re(4): DA> FYI, that patch doesn't compile, due to a typo... Fix below: Thanks, I will try that patch tomorrow. Meanwhile I have set up two more machines. Now I have 5 ITX systems, each with 2 re-NICs, and only one is behaving strange. The only hardware thing that is different in this system from the others is an additional SATA-controller. Can there be conflicts with this card which are triggering the problems? cu Gerrit
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080529171351.a3dd5111.gerrit>