Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 12:49:44 +0100 From: David Chisnall <theraven@theravensnest.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Clang as default compiler November 4th Message-ID: <7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D@theravensnest.org> In-Reply-To: <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us> References: <20120910211207.GC64920@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20120911104518.GF37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120911120649.GA52235@freebsd.org> <20120911132410.GA87126@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <504F4645.4070900@FreeBSD.org> <20120911150356.GA87526@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <5050513C.7040100@dougbarton.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 Sep 2012, at 10:09, Doug Barton wrote: > Also, users who actually are helping with testing clang for ports > continue to report runtime problems, even with things that build fine. I hope that you are encouraging maintainers of ports that don't work as expected with clang to submit bug reports upstream. We can't fix bugs if we aren't made aware of them. David Current hat: LLVM / Clang developer.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7778270C-218B-4F23-9941-D6DBED8E054D>