Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 04:01:43 +0100 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: drew-dated-1038498271.901d05@poured.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sharing calendars? Message-ID: <a05200f26ba05f12af913@[192.168.0.3]> In-Reply-To: <3DE00781.F47E59A1@mindspring.com> References: <GEEGJMKEOCMNOBOAHIOMMENACBAA.pcable@slaudiovis.org> <a05200f1bba044cddeec9@[192.168.0.3]> <l6vzns0uvol.fsf@williams.mc.vanderbilt.edu> <3DE00781.F47E59A1@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:56 PM -0800 2002/11/23, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Why are soft updates bad for mail queues, in your opinions?
In general, softupdates are very good for mail queues. Indeed,
this is the case for which softupdates is almost ideal.
However, both qmail and exim make some assumptions about the
underlying filesystems which are not valid when those filesystems are
using softupdates. Therefore, if you are going to use either exim or
qmail on *BSD, you need to turn off softupdates on the respective
mail queue partitions.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a05200f26ba05f12af913>