Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 01:11:17 -0000 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sys_generic.c Message-ID: <20050125154439.GH5662@lum.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <86669.1106667584@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20050125153729.GF5662@lum.celabo.org> <86669.1106667584@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050125153729.GF5662@lum.celabo.org>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: > >On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 12:42:26PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:15:32AM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> > sys/kern sys_generic.c > >> > Log: > >> > Previously a read of zero bytes got handled in devfs:vop_read() but I > >> > missed that when the vnode bypass was introduced. > >> > > >> > Deal with zero length transfers before we even get to fo_ops->fo_read(). > >> > >> Please back it out. Zero bytes read may affect atime, now not. > > > >I do not think that a zero byte read should not affect atime. > > Explain to me then why open+mmap doesn't affect atime isn't a bigger problem ? Er. (a) Sorry I missed the rest of the thread before posting--- I do not really have anything to add at this point. (b) I put one too many negatives in the sentence above: s/do not think/think/. (^_^;) Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050125154439.GH5662>