Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 2006 14:02:11 +0100
From:      Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl
Message-ID:  <20060512130211.GA89089@submonkey.net>
In-Reply-To: <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org>
References:  <200605120254.k4C2s3BS052028@repoman.freebsd.org> <4464020F.3000609@freebsd.org> <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:41:50AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> >If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >>andre       2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC
> >>
> >>  FreeBSD doc repository (src committer)
> >>
> >>  Modified files:
> >>    en                   index.xsl=20
> >>  Log:
> >>  Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of=20
> >>  architectures
> >>  a bit.
> >
> >I wonder if the !alpha part was a little premature?  Yes, the alpha
> >kernel bits are gone from HEAD, but they're still around on RELENG_5 and
> >RELENG_6, and we're still planning to do releases from both of those
> >codelines.  The first release that won't include alpha will be 7.0, and
> >its release cycle doesn't even *start* for over a year.
> >
> >Just a thought...
>=20
> There are like two remaining Alpha users and we most likely won't gain
> any new ones in the foreseeable future. Though we are compiling releases
> according to jhb it isn't even clear they actually work on Alpha.  It's
> not actively maintained anymore.  It really has left the building and the=
re
> is no point in advertising it on our homepage instead of on some random
> tombstone somewhere out in the past architectures graveyard.

That's as may be, but you really should have gotten approval from a doc
committer for this commit.  Bruce is one, he disagrees, you should back
it out.

Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEZIdTocfcwTS3JF8RAniNAKCejkeCSmgZtkSO3fPHRBohXIXBeQCgtiv2
CWqp1k2NWGRCWBO456w3b8o=
=AOp3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060512130211.GA89089>