Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:30:19 +0200 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kadmin (heimdal port) ignores the ldap backend Message-ID: <42A5854B.5000205@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <66836569@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <429D8B3B.50203@ng.fadesa.es> <29469499@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429DE188.5020908@ng.fadesa.es> <09783236@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429EE7D8.4050900@ng.fadesa.es> <65121725@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <42A025CA.2000107@ng.fadesa.es> <41916239@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <790a9fff05060309474f2f06eb@mail.gmail.com> <42A43AB4.8070504@ng.fadesa.es> <66836569@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:59:48 +0200 fandino wrote: >>ok, I see two possibles fixes: > >>1) set NO_KERBEROS in /etc/make.conf, it seems more painless solution >> than making wrapper scripts around kadmin, kdc, kpasswd and all >> kerberized programs. > > You'll get non-kerberized apps. One of the most important is > sshd. Those from port uses imho MIT Kerberos implementation. you are right here. >>2) also setting HEIMDAL_HOME=/usr at /etc/make.conf can be another solution. > > >>Now, to send a problem report to the heimdal maintainer port I think 2) is better >>because it's easier overwrite the base system than locate and remove several files. > > This one is better. ok, I will send this as the suggested solution. > And what about doing as-is now but changing LD_SEARCH order? I'm not sure about the implications of changing LD_SEARCH order because some ports are present in the base system and in the ports collection (sendmail, openssl, named,...) and I'm afraid of not so obvious combinations. Regards.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A5854B.5000205>