Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:30:19 +0200 From: fandino <fandino@ng.fadesa.es> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kadmin (heimdal port) ignores the ldap backend Message-ID: <42A5854B.5000205@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <66836569@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <429D8B3B.50203@ng.fadesa.es> <29469499@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429DE188.5020908@ng.fadesa.es> <09783236@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <429EE7D8.4050900@ng.fadesa.es> <65121725@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <42A025CA.2000107@ng.fadesa.es> <41916239@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <790a9fff05060309474f2f06eb@mail.gmail.com> <42A43AB4.8070504@ng.fadesa.es> <66836569@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:59:48 +0200 fandino wrote: >>ok, I see two possibles fixes: > >>1) set NO_KERBEROS in /etc/make.conf, it seems more painless solution >> than making wrapper scripts around kadmin, kdc, kpasswd and all >> kerberized programs. > > You'll get non-kerberized apps. One of the most important is > sshd. Those from port uses imho MIT Kerberos implementation. you are right here. >>2) also setting HEIMDAL_HOME=/usr at /etc/make.conf can be another solution. > > >>Now, to send a problem report to the heimdal maintainer port I think 2) is better >>because it's easier overwrite the base system than locate and remove several files. > > This one is better. ok, I will send this as the suggested solution. > And what about doing as-is now but changing LD_SEARCH order? I'm not sure about the implications of changing LD_SEARCH order because some ports are present in the base system and in the ports collection (sendmail, openssl, named,...) and I'm afraid of not so obvious combinations. Regards.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A5854B.5000205>