Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:18:28 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <Alex.Kovalenko@verizon.net> Cc: Thomas Quinot <thomas@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <20041015221828.669195D09@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:08:42 EDT." <1097878121.812.3.camel@RabbitsDen>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <Alex.Kovalenko@verizon.net> > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 18:08:42 -0400 > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 13:03, Thomas Quinot wrote: > > * Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko, 2004-10-15 : > > > > > be fair, I do not know if it still is the case. If there is enough > > > interest out there, I can plug it back in. > > > > If you can do that experiment and le tme know what happens, I'd > > certainly be interested in fixing this issue. > > > > Thomas. > > I have added device atapicam back into my config, rebuilt the kernel and > have been running for about an hour of light use with no visible ill > effects. I will keep it in at least through couple of buildworlds and CD > burns, but for now I would like to apologize for spreading FUD. Not really FUD, but old data. There certainly were problems with ATAPICAM for some time after the introduction of ATAng to RELENG_5. I have not seen any problems with it on any of my V5 systems for at least 3 months and probably longer. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041015221828.669195D09>