Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:03:31 +0200
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <s-shino@kt.rim.or.jp>, freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: BRIDGE problem in 4.3-BETA
Message-ID:  <20010313100331.A12943@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <20010313141526.BBC7.S-SHINO@kt.rim.or.jp>; from s-shino@kt.rim.or.jp on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 02:34:59PM %2B0900
References:  <20010313141526.BBC7.S-SHINO@kt.rim.or.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 02:34:59PM +0900, Shunsuke SHINOMIYA wrote:
> 
> Dear Sir,
> 
>  I testing FreeBSD 4.3-BETA as bridge and firewall with dummynet now.
>  BRIDGE seems to have a problem that caused by change in if_ethersubr.c
> between 1.70.2.12 and 1.70.2.13.
> 
>  For example, FreeBSD box has some NICs, the box can receive packets
> via only interface that assigned IP address. Some packets can not
> receive via another interfaces(IP address is not assigned).
> 
>  If kernel compiled with BRIDGE option, confirms destination of packets by
> bridge_dst_lookup() in bridge_in() and ether_demux() compare the
> packet's destination with only the received a NIC's MAC address and
> discard the packet if bridge_dst_lookup() returned BDG_LOCAL. 

Could someone please also take a look at PR kern/25630?  It seems that
this is the same problem..

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Hey, out there - is it *you* reading me, or is it someone else?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010313100331.A12943>