Date: Fri, 22 Aug 1997 10:13:45 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: Daniel Ortmann <ortmann@sparc.isl.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sgml doc format Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970822100534.19085Z-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199708220525.AAA02516@watcher.isl.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Daniel Ortmann wrote: > Some of our documents are generated by sgmlfmt via bsd.sgml.mk, [snip] > ... but I was surprised that I couldn't find it under the source > tree. Finally I found sgmlformat under the ports tree. > > What is the plan for sgmlfmt? The tools have been moved to the ports collection. For an equivalent setup, install: textproc/iso8879 (ISO character entities) textproc/linuxdoc (linuxdoc DTDs) textproc/docbook (DocBook DTDs) textproc/jade (SGML parser and DSSSL processor) textproc/sgmlformat (the old sgmlfmt command and instant(1)) Then you can zap /usr/bin/(sgmlfmt|sgmls|instant) and /usr/share/sgml/* to avoid confusion. bsd.sgml.mk lingers because I have not expended the five minutes necessary to rewrite the Makefiles for the handbook and FAO. Once I do that, bsd.sgml.mk will vanish. BUT...if people are still using bsd.sgml.mk for their own projects...hmm...how best to deal with this? -john
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970822100534.19085Z-100000>