Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc:        Richard Sharpe <sharpe@ns.aus.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Patch #2 (was Re: Found the problem, w/patch (was Re: FreeBSD  performing worse than Linux?))
Message-ID:  <200112020855.fB28ted90601@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <E16AS6u-000FKm-00@pampa.cs.huji.ac.il>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:>     slightly better results with Patch #3 and delayed acks turned on.
:> 
:> 						-Matt
:i did not apply any patches - yet -, net.inet.tcp.newreno is 1, on both hosts.
:they are connected at 100mb, so the strange numbers are when the number of
:clients is > 3! (att 100Mbit/sec how come i get > 100?)

   It's a synchronous protocol, so the number of bits per byte is not
   necessarily 10... it can be 8, 9, or 10.  Approximately.

:	danny
:PS: just forgot, congrat on a terrific job!!! im still amazed

					-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112020855.fB28ted90601>