Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:33:48 -0400 From: Jim Durham <durham@jcdurham.com> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kphone / linphone / asterisk Message-ID: <200410200933.49034.durham@jcdurham.com> In-Reply-To: <20041020002731.Q435@freeman.4gh.net> References: <200410192330.23055.durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us> <20041020002731.Q435@freeman.4gh.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 01:51 am, Stuart Barkley wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 at 23:30 -0400, Jim Durham wrote: > > Has anyone got kphone to work on 5.x or 4.x ? > > I've recently tried both net/linphone and net/kphone on 4.10 with no > success and have also been wondering if anyone has them working > correctly. I've tried most combinations of kphone, linphone and > sipomatic (test responder with linphone) on two machines running 4.10. > (SNIP!!) > So far I haven't done any real debugging. I was hoping one > combination would work starting off. I'm open to suggestions as to > which would be best to concentrate on. I'm inclined to try linphonec > (net/linphone-base) first. The guis on kphone and linphone seem > pretty miserable and mouse intensive. linphonec also is the one I'm > currently having the most luck with (some audio passes). > > Stuart Barkley Stuart, Thanks...now I'm really discouraged 8-( !! I should report that I also tried kphone on Debian Linux and it didn't work for me there either. I'm fairly certain that the setup is correct as it does work on 5.2.1 with the choppy audio, but other functions work as advertised. I contacted the port maintainer for FreeBSD and he said he had noticed the chopping problem but apparently it is usable on his machine and he didn't have the time to debug my problem. -Jim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410200933.49034.durham>