Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 13:51:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Mitchell <brian@firehouse.net> To: Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com> Cc: dcarmich@mcs.com, Shimon@i-Connect.Net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.971013134922.23319B-100000@shell.firehouse.net> In-Reply-To: <199710131307.JAA01460@lakes.dignus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > Simon Shapiro writes:> > > > > Hi Douglas Carmichael; On 13-Oct-97 you wrote: > > > Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards > > > FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a > > > network)? > > > > Last I checked (looooong time ago), Unix had the same problem. TCP/IP was, > > at the time, inhenerntly un-Orangable. > > > > Hmmm.. Data General has a variant of DG/UX which is at least B1 (if not > C2...) Does anyone know the details there? Perhaps I can dig up some > old contacts and find out what they did with this issue. > > - Dave Rivers - > > Do they? Last I checked, it had not been out of evaluation yet. Has this changed? It wasnt on the NSA page as of a few weeks ago.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.971013134922.23319B-100000>