Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:38:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: wireless@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280546] iwlwifi panic in BT COEX code (FIXED?) Message-ID: <bug-280546-21060-uOS7UGZJzV@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-280546-21060@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=280546 --- Comment #36 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit in branch stable/14 references this bug: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3a35e07fa9309a357f9f7d25e86aba6f93c0af84 commit 3a35e07fa9309a357f9f7d25e86aba6f93c0af84 Author: Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org> AuthorDate: 2025-04-08 23:05:43 +0000 Commit: Bjoern A. Zeeb <bz@FreeBSD.org> CommitDate: 2025-04-18 14:36:01 +0000 LinuxKPI: 802.11: add a lchanctx list to lhw While we are currently only supporting a single VAP (vif) it is less of a trouble but in order to get locking and rcu accesses [from drivers] more right add a list for all chanctx_conf we have for one hw. Use that list in the iterator function to avoid having to lock the vif but not protecting the chanctx list (against a parallel removal) due to different locking. Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation PR: 280546 Tested by: Oleksandr Kryvulia (shuriku shurik.kiev.ua) Tested by: Oleg Nauman (oleg.nauman gmail.com) [rtw88] Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D49734 (cherry picked from commit a8a47a41775b0320606f90b3ac2048bc23494615) sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---------- sys/compat/linuxkpi/common/src/linux_80211.h | 4 +++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-280546-21060-uOS7UGZJzV>