Date: Fri, 4 Jun 1999 22:48:17 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive on as default ? Message-ID: <000101beaf17$026896f0$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to> In-Reply-To: <54651.928560942@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Well, we've heard various opinions and I think we can conclude that: > > 2. That server applications should have keepalives enabled. Well, I certainly don't agree with that. Many server applications (web servers, mail servers, etcetera) already have data timeouts, which makes keepalives redundant. In my opinion, in the vast majority of cases, data timeouts are more logical than keepalives. 'telnetd' being the most obvious exception. DS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000101beaf17$026896f0$021d85d1>