Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:50:48 +0200 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/30203: description of security profiles in FAQ is just plain wrong Message-ID: <20010831185048.N95956@lpt.ens.fr> In-Reply-To: <200108311643.f7VGhUq85376@intruder.bmah.org>; from bmah@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:43:30AM -0700 References: <200108311630.f7VGU1V07031@freefall.freebsd.org> <200108311643.f7VGhUq85376@intruder.bmah.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce A. Mah said on Aug 31, 2001 at 09:43:30: > If memory serves me right, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > > > - is enabled or disabled.</para> > > > + <para>The following table describes what each of the > > > + security profiles does. The columns are the choices you > > > > "...what each of the security profiles does". The verb (does) doesn't > > agree in number with the subject (profiles). Or something like > > that--you get the idea. I'm not an English teacher, so I probably got > > the terms all wrong. I changed 'does' to 'do'. > > Actually, the subject is "each", which is singular. I'm pretty sure > Michael is right on this one. "Does" is definitely correct, not do. (Think "each and every one of the security profiles.") - Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010831185048.N95956>