Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:16:58 -0400 From: "Siva Mahadevan" <siva@FreeBSD.org> To: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@freebsd.org>, "Mark Johnston" <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: "Gleb Smirnoff" <glebius@freebsd.org>, <src-committers@freebsd.org>, <dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org>, <dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org>, <owner-src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git: 9b76228006d8 - main - inpcb: retire inp_vnet Message-ID: <DHVGIV7U5UE0.3KB2IFFTJW6IH@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=4F7y2sZ3=2t8DhwMyVnkjCcm7ovu3Ybkknxp=374-Rg@mail.gmail.com> References: <69de65eb.21a5c.61244c2a@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <aeFPJWT7V4aJX_-F@nuc> <CAJ-Vmo=4F7y2sZ3=2t8DhwMyVnkjCcm7ovu3Ybkknxp=374-Rg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri Apr 17, 2026 at 46:00 UTC, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Apr 2026 at 14:05, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> It's possible to have inp->inp_socket == NULL here. This is triggered >> by the sys/netinet/tcp_hpts_test.py tests. >> >> > /* Lets do any logging that we might want to */ >> > tcp_hpts_log(hpts, tp, &tv, slots_to_run, i, from_callout); >> > > > Do you think it's worth reverting? it's been a couple days and I just > got emailed about that > test failing after I landed some unrelated stuff! > I think it's worth reverting. This is preventing other tests from completing: https://ci.freebsd.org/tinderbox/ (the archs that do complete don't have python installed, and thus skip this test).home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DHVGIV7U5UE0.3KB2IFFTJW6IH>