Date: Mon, 02 Nov 1998 20:16:03 +0900 From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh <itojun@itojun.org> To: dg@root.com Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 in -current Message-ID: <4612.910005363@coconut.itojun.org> In-Reply-To: dg's message of Mon, 02 Nov 1998 02:48:51 PST. <199811021048.CAA01511@implode.root.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> We haven't made any decisions yet on which stack to go with. The KAME >implementation is compelling because of the dedication (to FreeBSD) of the >people working on it. INRIA is interesting because of rumors that it is >somehow "better" than KAME. The point Garrett is trying to make is that >once we decide on one, that leaves the other(s) out in the cold, which is >not a good thing. NOTE: this is independent from the merging issues. Could I hear about the technical reasons for the above "rumor"? Could someone send me the details of what you felt? I would like to fix that ASAP, if it really is a technical issues. We are trying to catch up to latest IPv6 specs (I believe KAME is most aggressive in this point), making coments to where specs seems to be wrong, and so forth. We really are putting our 7x24 hours:-) to KAME. If it is packaging issues, I would like to state the following for KAME 2.2.7 kit: - we intentionally NOT overwriting existing tools, like /usr/bin/ftp. This surprises people too much, especially in multiuser installations. - we are trying NOT to require "make World" for installation. therefore, we do not use /usr/src tree for this. It can be changed for KAME 3.0, of course. If it is irrelevant for current@freebsd, plese reply me personally. itojun@kame.net itojun@itojun.org jun-ichiro itoh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4612.910005363>