Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:38:41 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko <gaijin.k@gmail.com>, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, martinko <gamato@users.sf.net> Subject: Re: Short SMART check causes disk op timeouts Message-ID: <200810280938.42162.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20081027220321.GA31809@icarus.home.lan> References: <4905951B.2050602@sh.cvut.cz> <1225143026.1052.9.camel@RabbitsDen> <20081027220321.GA31809@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 27 October 2008 20:03:21 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > I had no idea users were blindly uncommenting examples in well seems you're new in support business then :) the issue might be the reason why weapons are not delivered with roles in t= he=20 chambers ... so developers probably should take care of what kind of exampl= e=20 they include=20 > smartd.conf.sample without reading what the features do. =A0Then again, I > guess many users/admins have no idea what sort of impact offline tests > could have on a system. =A0Short/long tests should not have any effect on > a running/used disk -- and most do not see any effect -- but under high > I/O I would assume there is a chance the suspend/resume aspect of SMART > tests could take longer than 5 seconds. =A0Though I am disappointed in > the fact that people often schedule "maintenance things" all at the same > time (between 0200 and 0500) but never think about the implications of > them all running in parallel. well good idea to start a faq with general orientations :) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200810280938.42162.joao>