Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:29:44 -0400 From: Xn Nooby <xnooby@gmail.com> To: Antonio Olivares <olivares14031@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A small script to customize FreeBSD Message-ID: <BANLkTikdVku5oTMHGfgaW8-izKKy8KGb4Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin_vrAVcwGdsTKLv8T1T=CHj2_8NA@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=5TTgA94sd6KU-XToS=qDBnNYWTg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinvg0ewgvTKbzGk94AyGz%2B1yxmQLg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin%2BODPaYLUXH83inyPFxHvcUZQ8Kw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTin_vrAVcwGdsTKLv8T1T=CHj2_8NA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> kldload snd_driver > will load the sound driver that it thinks would be the best, but then I considered using the auto-detect driver, I probably should in a script used by many people. I did not know if there were any disadvantages to using it. > I see the following code could do the job, but it might need some testing :( That is an interesting script - is there an advantage over loading the auto-detect driver? I have trouble knowing which driver to load, even when the system tells what it loaded using the auto-detect driver, lol. > Antonio thanks for the suggestion!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikdVku5oTMHGfgaW8-izKKy8KGb4Q>