Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:35:02 -0000 From: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpthreadMakefilesrc/lib/libpthread/thread thr_attr_get_np.c thr_attr_init.c thr_attr_setcreatesuspend_np.c Message-ID: <20030418113144.K93085@volatile.chemikals.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304180221230.4419-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304180221230.4419-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > This library now passes all of the ACE tests that libc_r passes > > with the exception of one. It also seems to work OK with KDE > > including konqueror, kwrite, etc. I haven't been able to get > > mozilla to run due to lack of java plugin, so I'd be interested > > to see how it works with that. > > Thanks to marcel, I've finally figured out how to get mozilla > running. It seems to work OK with these changes, but having > never used it before, I'm not sure what to expect. Ok, I'm a but confuzzled by all these threading libraries. Now we have libc_r, libthr, and libpthread? How can I alter the behavior of "-pthread" to use a different library? As far as I can tell, only libc_r is actually linked in with a buildworld, so when is it planned to make these available? What are the advantages and disadvantages? Which library is more complete? Can someone do a summary of some sort to help out the consumers? -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030418113144.K93085>