Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      09 May 2000 18:08:13 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        sthaug@nethelp.no
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Netfinity 5600 patches
Message-ID:  <xzpln1jvh8y.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: sthaug@nethelp.no's message of "Tue, 09 May 2000 17:43:49 %2B0200"
References:  <xzppuqwug2c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <81904.957887029@verdi.nethelp.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
sthaug@nethelp.no writes:
> As far as I can see, these patches aren't needed for 4.0-STABLE. I
> have a 4.0-STABLE system here with no kernel patches, and it seems
> to be working fine. Note that there is already support for the RCC
> chipsets in /sys/i386/isa/pcibus.c. See attached boot messages.

You're right - I never got around to testing a recent 4.0 on the 5600.
I've tried running 3.4-RELEASE as well as whichever version of 4.0 is
on the latest snapshot CD.

> For 3.x, isn't Andrew Gallatin's patch more general? See
> http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=60828+0+archive/2000/freebsd-smp/20000423.freebsd-smp

Looks like it - and Andrew's the one who added support for the RCC in
the first place.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpln1jvh8y.fsf>